I extracted the severe entries from the data, which mostly pertained for the short-term, to neurological events (Bell's Palsy, Memory or Hearing Loss, etc.), since myocarditis is often diagnosed much later than the window of the study. I then compared that 'severe' group to the severe events reported in the US VAERS database, extracted 5 Feb 2022.
If this is comparative, and I am sure that I am under-estimating this by several shortfalls in specific AE's (death, myocarditis, stroke, etc.), then the US VAERS database is under-reporting severe adverse events, by a factor of 30 to 1 on these AE's alone.
This is surreal -- I just tried to find a mention of this report on the wider Internet... ANYWHERE... and not a peep. It's only circulating in Hebrew media.
Even Israel Hayom, which reported this in detail on the 9th (before it was released to the public?) didn't bother posting a story to their English site.
You are apparently 'scooping' them all. Kol HaKAVOD!
Id like to know if there are any studies on HIV related to the covid vaccine? I find it odd that now Moderna has a new HIV vax coming out soon. I know that people who have taken the shot, now are sick all the time so it makes me wonder if their lack of antibodies is causing a new HIV type disease? Before Luk Montagnier passed away a couple of weeks ago - just 10 days after he mentioned that the makers of the covid shot used an HIV strain in their shot - odd huh? that now people have tested positive for HIV after their shot. So, now I am wondering if HIV is going to be the next pandemic? Will VAIDS (vaccine induced HIV) be sexually transmitted? That leads me to vaccine shedding...are we all now "vaccinated" by proxy just by being in close contact to someone who had the shot....so many questions.
3 facts are (perhaps misleadingly) pointing in the same direction of connection between HIV and the jab. It still doesn't mean at all that this connection is true:
1. The known HIV false positive issue
2. The known damage to the immune system.
3. The new focus on HIV and Moderna announcement.
Between this and actually getting bad old HIV from the jab the distance is huge.
Interesting. So, I have learned that the C19 tests are also mostly false positives too. Basically the tests are a joke and a way to get people to be afraid of an illness that is 99% recoverable. I know nothing about HIV other than what I learned 40 years ago from the propaganda that was spread back then. Infected mostly gay men spread this virus via sex, semen, blood and saliva. No one knew where it came from.
Could it be, that like the C19 tests, the CDC, FDA and Fauci faked much of the HIV illness, gave drugs that basically murdered people or made people super sick which then became the 'HIV" positive because they had no immune system left after these drugs and then called it AIDS? People died due to the drug effects rather than a virus?
THIS!!! RFK, Jr's book is the MOST Chock-full of legit information--- ALL peer reviewed studies, ALL doctors/researchers will inpeccable credentials and ALL the sourced info you could ever want. He nails Fauci to the WALL, 10 times over. Fauci made his bed. He lies in it, literally and figuratively. It is INCREDIBLE-- but proof is right there. Read THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCI.
I see a big problem in this dataset. Where is the control group? 26% of people with autoimmune disorders report exacerbations. Given it is the "norm" for many AI conditions wax and wane, we need to see a non-vaccinated group and determine a baseline rate for % that experienced exacerbations within X days. If the treatment group is measuring exacerbations w/in 30 days, then X = 30. If w/in 60 days then X = 60.
I was particularly interested in the AI stats. But, even without a control group, 25% seems like a very high number to me. Another thing I found interesting - the pfizer trial with 18600 participants in the treatment arm, also coincidentally had only 62 people with Rheumatism. Sounds like that might be a little bit undersampled...
With upwards of 80% of Israelis having taken at least one or two Pfizer jabs under government pressure, there IS no unvaxxed "control group" in our country.
I have the same question. It would have been nice to create a control group from some 2 dose people who hadn't yet been boosted, for a similar length of time, long after their most recent dose.
If I'm not mistaken, 2-dose recipients would be a bad choice for a control group, as they would add a confounding factor which is now unknowable.
I'm talking about the long-term AEs of the 2-dose regime, which were supposed to be tracked until 2023 (according to Pfizer).
Any controlled tracking was irretrievably muddied when millions of them submitted to dose 3 and/or 4.
The fact that our health clinics are still urging unvaxxed citizens to get the shots (including those with natural covid immunity), and are giving boosters as often as 3 months apart -- AND are now mixing 3 different vaccine brands! -- would suggest that establishing controls and baselines are not exactly a priority.
From an Israeli viewpoint, it's a miracle that the MOH is even admitting that there are AEs showing up after dose no. 3. We have no idea what prompted this momentary fit of honesty.
But as I mentioned, Israel was not keen on sharing the news with the world - the report stayed hidden in Hebrew until Galileo uploaded a translation.
I totally agree with everything you say here, but I guess I still think it would be better than nothing. If it showed a much lower rate it would certainly be suggestive. Given the vax rates in israel it would be hard to find a real control group that didn't also have confounders.
Maybe there are unpolluted stats on AI disesase recurrence or flare-up rates from pre 2021 that could be drawn upon.
I dare say there *are* clean stats to work with. I looked up the current nationwide figure on the MOH dashboard, and 28% of Israeli citizens have so far avoided all jabs (apologies to Dr. Kaplan-Singer for over-estimating the vax rate earlier - it's 72%). That's a potential pool of 2.7 million.
Clearly no one in authority is INTERESTED in any comparison between jabbed and unjabbed. It could trigger an epidemic of lawsuits against the MOH and all the companies that required their employees to get jabbed or get fired.
Besides the sad horror stories posted on the Israeli testimony site of Pfizer injuries, there are untold numbers of jabbed Israelis fighting with auto-immune or cardiac reactions that aren't severe enough to be considered 'injuries' and weren't even reported.
I have two family members and one close friend in the latter category. And we are only one year into this genetic programming experiment.
I imagine that the MOH is realizing the futility of trying to patch the breaking dam (suppress the leaking evidence of bad outcomes) and is now trying to relocate somewhere above the flood plain (belatedly join the honest scientists who were predicting those outcomes for 2 years).
Or... Maybe it's a few honest scientists in the MOH, who were always arguing behind closed doors and are finally getting the upper hand. As an incurable optimist, I want to believe this.
I agree with your take that there is very little interest in evaluating the effectiveness of any of the "pandemic" interventions, and this is absolutely criminal. I agree we are only looking for a few thousand people so it should be possible to find a cohort-matched control group.
I hope that whatever phenomenon has led to this data being produced continues (maybe it's people bailing out and trying to save their skins).. we should encourage these defectors. I feel like the problem really is big enough that it can't go unnoticed without some really draconian clampdowns and psyops.. the likes of which are unprecedented.
Now that the insurance companies can't really hide the results anymore.. it's got to come out.
And these numbers are low. My friends, a married couple living near Netanya, took the shots together. The day after she received the shot my friend lost feeling in her feet. Her doctor insisted it had nothing to do with the shot and that there was nothing that could be done so it was not reported. A year later she finally saw a neurologist who said of course it was from the shot and that steroids might have helped but it was too late. She has also suffered a stroke and now has a pacemaker. Her husband suddenly developed aggressive lung cancer and died last year. None of this was reported as related to the shots but I think it all was.
Wow, thank you very much. I appreciate the translation! Just a detail about page 8: in the 5th row, it reads, "People contacted but could not be interviewed, and 8 attempts were not made to reconnect." I'm guessing this means "and 8 attempts at reconnecting were unsuccessful"?
Are you "prof_shahar" on twitter? If so I missed you the past month or so. In early Dec, prof_shahar posted on Influenza; I found the original source for Sweden and it looks like Omicron has beaten Influenza there, at least for now. I wish to know how the competition came out for Israel.
I am not Prof Shahar. If you are behind this article https://swprs.org/covid-vaccines-the-next-vioxx/ I suggest that you fix this minor mistake. You may refer to me as "substack's Galileo". Good article BTW
Thanks for this Galileo,
I extracted the severe entries from the data, which mostly pertained for the short-term, to neurological events (Bell's Palsy, Memory or Hearing Loss, etc.), since myocarditis is often diagnosed much later than the window of the study. I then compared that 'severe' group to the severe events reported in the US VAERS database, extracted 5 Feb 2022.
If this is comparative, and I am sure that I am under-estimating this by several shortfalls in specific AE's (death, myocarditis, stroke, etc.), then the US VAERS database is under-reporting severe adverse events, by a factor of 30 to 1 on these AE's alone.
EVG
TES :-)
This is surreal -- I just tried to find a mention of this report on the wider Internet... ANYWHERE... and not a peep. It's only circulating in Hebrew media.
Even Israel Hayom, which reported this in detail on the 9th (before it was released to the public?) didn't bother posting a story to their English site.
You are apparently 'scooping' them all. Kol HaKAVOD!
Thanks so much for the PDF!
Id like to know if there are any studies on HIV related to the covid vaccine? I find it odd that now Moderna has a new HIV vax coming out soon. I know that people who have taken the shot, now are sick all the time so it makes me wonder if their lack of antibodies is causing a new HIV type disease? Before Luk Montagnier passed away a couple of weeks ago - just 10 days after he mentioned that the makers of the covid shot used an HIV strain in their shot - odd huh? that now people have tested positive for HIV after their shot. So, now I am wondering if HIV is going to be the next pandemic? Will VAIDS (vaccine induced HIV) be sexually transmitted? That leads me to vaccine shedding...are we all now "vaccinated" by proxy just by being in close contact to someone who had the shot....so many questions.
3 facts are (perhaps misleadingly) pointing in the same direction of connection between HIV and the jab. It still doesn't mean at all that this connection is true:
1. The known HIV false positive issue
2. The known damage to the immune system.
3. The new focus on HIV and Moderna announcement.
Between this and actually getting bad old HIV from the jab the distance is huge.
Interesting. So, I have learned that the C19 tests are also mostly false positives too. Basically the tests are a joke and a way to get people to be afraid of an illness that is 99% recoverable. I know nothing about HIV other than what I learned 40 years ago from the propaganda that was spread back then. Infected mostly gay men spread this virus via sex, semen, blood and saliva. No one knew where it came from.
Could it be, that like the C19 tests, the CDC, FDA and Fauci faked much of the HIV illness, gave drugs that basically murdered people or made people super sick which then became the 'HIV" positive because they had no immune system left after these drugs and then called it AIDS? People died due to the drug effects rather than a virus?
Read RFK Jr's book, "The Real Anthony Fauci". He discusses Dr. Fauci's role in the HIV crises.
THIS!!! RFK, Jr's book is the MOST Chock-full of legit information--- ALL peer reviewed studies, ALL doctors/researchers will inpeccable credentials and ALL the sourced info you could ever want. He nails Fauci to the WALL, 10 times over. Fauci made his bed. He lies in it, literally and figuratively. It is INCREDIBLE-- but proof is right there. Read THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCI.
I see a big problem in this dataset. Where is the control group? 26% of people with autoimmune disorders report exacerbations. Given it is the "norm" for many AI conditions wax and wane, we need to see a non-vaccinated group and determine a baseline rate for % that experienced exacerbations within X days. If the treatment group is measuring exacerbations w/in 30 days, then X = 30. If w/in 60 days then X = 60.
Please note that the survey period is very short.
your comment may be very relevant to the auto immune disorders.
Less so for some events with minimal background rates such as chest pains.
I was particularly interested in the AI stats. But, even without a control group, 25% seems like a very high number to me. Another thing I found interesting - the pfizer trial with 18600 participants in the treatment arm, also coincidentally had only 62 people with Rheumatism. Sounds like that might be a little bit undersampled...
With upwards of 80% of Israelis having taken at least one or two Pfizer jabs under government pressure, there IS no unvaxxed "control group" in our country.
There is still a good control group.
The Israeli MOH has been lying regarding the vaccination rates and later updated it downward.
Only country in the world afaik.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccine-by-age?country=~ISR
I have the same question. It would have been nice to create a control group from some 2 dose people who hadn't yet been boosted, for a similar length of time, long after their most recent dose.
If I'm not mistaken, 2-dose recipients would be a bad choice for a control group, as they would add a confounding factor which is now unknowable.
I'm talking about the long-term AEs of the 2-dose regime, which were supposed to be tracked until 2023 (according to Pfizer).
Any controlled tracking was irretrievably muddied when millions of them submitted to dose 3 and/or 4.
The fact that our health clinics are still urging unvaxxed citizens to get the shots (including those with natural covid immunity), and are giving boosters as often as 3 months apart -- AND are now mixing 3 different vaccine brands! -- would suggest that establishing controls and baselines are not exactly a priority.
From an Israeli viewpoint, it's a miracle that the MOH is even admitting that there are AEs showing up after dose no. 3. We have no idea what prompted this momentary fit of honesty.
But as I mentioned, Israel was not keen on sharing the news with the world - the report stayed hidden in Hebrew until Galileo uploaded a translation.
Can you imagine that it was not in the news in Israel either?
Even that it contradicts everything the MOH experts have been saying for more than a year now.
A momentary lapse of honesty. They are under a lot of pressure here. trying ti prove that their hands are clean. Unfortunately they are not.
I totally agree with everything you say here, but I guess I still think it would be better than nothing. If it showed a much lower rate it would certainly be suggestive. Given the vax rates in israel it would be hard to find a real control group that didn't also have confounders.
Maybe there are unpolluted stats on AI disesase recurrence or flare-up rates from pre 2021 that could be drawn upon.
I dare say there *are* clean stats to work with. I looked up the current nationwide figure on the MOH dashboard, and 28% of Israeli citizens have so far avoided all jabs (apologies to Dr. Kaplan-Singer for over-estimating the vax rate earlier - it's 72%). That's a potential pool of 2.7 million.
Clearly no one in authority is INTERESTED in any comparison between jabbed and unjabbed. It could trigger an epidemic of lawsuits against the MOH and all the companies that required their employees to get jabbed or get fired.
Besides the sad horror stories posted on the Israeli testimony site of Pfizer injuries, there are untold numbers of jabbed Israelis fighting with auto-immune or cardiac reactions that aren't severe enough to be considered 'injuries' and weren't even reported.
I have two family members and one close friend in the latter category. And we are only one year into this genetic programming experiment.
I imagine that the MOH is realizing the futility of trying to patch the breaking dam (suppress the leaking evidence of bad outcomes) and is now trying to relocate somewhere above the flood plain (belatedly join the honest scientists who were predicting those outcomes for 2 years).
Or... Maybe it's a few honest scientists in the MOH, who were always arguing behind closed doors and are finally getting the upper hand. As an incurable optimist, I want to believe this.
I agree with your take that there is very little interest in evaluating the effectiveness of any of the "pandemic" interventions, and this is absolutely criminal. I agree we are only looking for a few thousand people so it should be possible to find a cohort-matched control group.
I hope that whatever phenomenon has led to this data being produced continues (maybe it's people bailing out and trying to save their skins).. we should encourage these defectors. I feel like the problem really is big enough that it can't go unnoticed without some really draconian clampdowns and psyops.. the likes of which are unprecedented.
Now that the insurance companies can't really hide the results anymore.. it's got to come out.
Thank you for this. Where can I find the original untranslated Hebrew study?
Scroll down to p. 27; it begins there.
It's bad. So freaking bad.
And these numbers are low. My friends, a married couple living near Netanya, took the shots together. The day after she received the shot my friend lost feeling in her feet. Her doctor insisted it had nothing to do with the shot and that there was nothing that could be done so it was not reported. A year later she finally saw a neurologist who said of course it was from the shot and that steroids might have helped but it was too late. She has also suffered a stroke and now has a pacemaker. Her husband suddenly developed aggressive lung cancer and died last year. None of this was reported as related to the shots but I think it all was.
Thank you for sharing with the world!
Thank you for the terrific work- Shocking results. Duplicity has a new face.
Wow, thank you very much. I appreciate the translation! Just a detail about page 8: in the 5th row, it reads, "People contacted but could not be interviewed, and 8 attempts were not made to reconnect." I'm guessing this means "and 8 attempts at reconnecting were unsuccessful"?
Are you "prof_shahar" on twitter? If so I missed you the past month or so. In early Dec, prof_shahar posted on Influenza; I found the original source for Sweden and it looks like Omicron has beaten Influenza there, at least for now. I wish to know how the competition came out for Israel.
I am not Prof Shahar. If you are behind this article https://swprs.org/covid-vaccines-the-next-vioxx/ I suggest that you fix this minor mistake. You may refer to me as "substack's Galileo". Good article BTW